Get the original audio story here.
Some students are outraged after an MU student newspaper prank went wrong.
This year’s “April Fools” edition of The Maneater is making waves, and people say it’s more vulgar and profane than ever before.
Now RHA Speaker Kathy Rudd is sending a letter to the editor, and it’s getting big attention.
“I was just overwhelmed by how much of it was really offensive, a lot of words I don’t think you can even say on the radio, let alone print in a newspaper,” Rudd said.
More than two hundred people signed Rudd’s letter, and now she’s sending it on to the Maneater.
“It’s evolved into really saying, this isn’t satire, and this isn’t journalism,” Rudd said. “And if you’re going to do the April Fools edition in the future, you need to think about how you can be funny, and witty, and work with what’s here, as opposed to just cussing for the heck of it and doing something that’s profane and trite.”
After talking with Maneater staff members, it turns out most of them actually agree.
Editor Kelly Olejnik was very surprised by the paper’s content.
“I am just as offended as everyone else,” Olejnik said. “The editorial board was not as involved on the decisions made on the issue and the majority of us did not know what it was going to look like.”
In fact Olejnik said she didn’t even know the title would be as raunchy as it turned out.
“We thought that it was going to be called the HumanEater or the PersonEater and not have as much offensive language,” she said. “I for one wasn’t happy about a lot of the bylines that were in there… a lot of things just went very wrong, and a lot of us aren’t happy.”
Staff member Pat Iverson echoed Olejnik’s sentiments as well.
“If you’re going to do an April fools issue, you need a balance,” Iverson said. “The risk of doing it wrong is what we have now. If not done carefully, then you have this on your hands.”
Olejnik said the paper’s Managing Editor was largely responsible for the questionable content put in this year’s joke edition. Iverson agrees that although the blame may fall on just a few people, the entire paper’s reputation is on the line.
“We’re going to make an effort to prove to our readers that we are a serious business,” Iverson said. “We can only hope to regain that trust in the coming months.”
Olejnik and Iverson said the paper plans to respond quickly and forcefully to the issue, and Rudd hopes her letter, along with the support of hundreds of students including Maneater staff writers, will help.
“If something good comes from this, if the Maneater editors pay more attention to what goes into their paper, then I think that will be a positive outcome.”